As today is April 1st, better known as April Fools’ Day, we thought we’d separate the truth from the tricks in a special quiz. Below are ten ‘facts’ about literary works or famous writers which may be true or may be utterly false (but often believed to be true). Can you tell the the facts from the fiction? Or will you end up fooled? We’ll put the questions in the top half, and the answers and explanations underneath. Tell us how you do in the comments below, and invite your friends and family to take the fiendish foolish quiz!
1. In the 1980s, John Steinbeck’s novel The Grapes of Wrath was translated into Japanese as ‘The Angry Raisins’.
2. Book paper almost always catches fire and burns at 451 degrees Fahrenheit, hence the title of Ray Bradbury’s novel.
3. One of Dylan Thomas’s first published poems was plagiarised from a comic called the Boy’s Own Paper. This wasn’t discovered for forty years.
4. In 1910, Virginia Woolf and her friends dressed up as Abyssinian royalty and succeeded in tricking the British Royal Navy into giving them a guided tour of the HMS Dreadnought.
5. Ironically, there is a CCTV camera outside George Orwell’s old house – directly beside a blue plaque commemorating the man who wrote ‘Big Brother is watching you’.
6. Herman Melville’s classic novel Moby-Dick gave the coffee-house chain Starbucks its name.
7. Robert Browning used the word ‘twats’ in his 1841 poem Pippa Passes, because he laboured under the mistaken belief that the word referred to ‘a piece of headgear worn by nuns’.
8. An Italian translation of Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four has the clocks striking ‘uno’ instead of thirteen because, according to the translator, ‘Italian clocks don’t go up to thirteen’.
9. Queen Victoria enjoyed Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland so much that she requested a first edition of Carroll’s next book. Carroll duly sent her a copy of the next book he published – a mathematical work with the exciting title An Elementary Treatise on Determinants.
10. The Woozle effect is the name given to the phenomenon when an incorrect fact is repeatedly cited, and thus attains the status of urban legend.
So, how did you do? Find out below…
1. False. This is a rumour which that great website of debunkery, Snopes, has dealt with in depth. The story perhaps says more about cultural attitudes than it does about actual translations of Steinbeck’s novel!
2. False. Contrary to what Bradbury says at the start of his novel, Fahrenheit 451, book paper almost never catches fire at 451 degrees Fahrenheit – there is no set temperature for the auto-ignition of paper. The temperature is usually much higher (nearer 480 degrees) and even at that temperature, a thick book would take a while to auto-ignite. Bradbury’s novel predicted, among other things, ATMs, flat-screen televisions, Bluetooth technology, and rolling news.
3. True. Thomas himself appears to have admitted the theft in an autobiographical story of 1940, thirteen years after the poem had appeared in print: ‘A poem I had had printed in the Western Mail was pasted on the mirror to make me blush, but the shame of the poem had died. Across the poem I had written with a stolen quill and in flourishes: “Homer Nods”.’ More on this story can be found at the blog of the Dylan Thomas Society.
4. True. We’ve written about this story in our anniversary post containing our twelve best facts from the first year of this site, but you can find out more about Woolf’s politically incorrect shenanigans in this Guardian article.
5. False. This photograph often does the rounds on Twitter and other websites, but it appears that it is not true, alas – the irony would be too delicious. There is a discussion about the picture here.
6. True. However, Moby-Dick wasn’t a classic in Melville’s own lifetime: for instance, between 1863 and 1887, an average of 23 copies of Moby-Dick were sold each year. It now sells more copies each year than were sold in the entire nineteenth century. Melville gave up writing soon after its publication: his last novel, the 1857 work The Confidence-Man, centred on the idea of a confidence trickster or con-man (then a new idiom in American society). The novel, which is all about a man who fools people, was set on one single day, April Fool’s Day, and was appropriately enough also published on April the 1st. However, the book was not a success, and after this, Melville gave up writing, and lived out the remainder of his life as a customs house official.
7. True. Browning had come across the word ‘twat’ in an old bawdy poem called ‘Vanity of Vanities,’ a poem of 1660, which contains the misleading lines: ‘They’d talk’t of his having a Cardinalls Hat, / They’d send him as soon an Old Nuns Twat.’ He got the wrong end of the stick and thought this must be part of a nun’s habit. His friends were too embarrassed ever to broach the subject with him…
8. True. This story is recounted by literary scholar John Sutherland in his book Where Was Rebecca Shot?. It appears to be true, and Sutherland’s credentials are impeccable, but if anyone knows otherwise – it does have the ring of legend about it – we’d like to know!
9. False. Unfortunately, like most good anecdotes, this one isn’t true: Carroll himself denied this exchange ever happened. But it does neatly encapsulate Carroll’s double life as both conservative Oxford mathematician Charles Dodgson and radical children’s author Lewis Carroll.
10. True. The phenomenon is named after the Woozle, a fictitious animal which features in Winnie-the-Pooh. Pooh and Piglet go hunting for the fabled Woozle, but they are unsuccessful. Christopher Robin later explains that they have in fact been following their own tracks around a tree.
Image: Jester reading a book, c. 1896, artist unknown, public domain.
I got 8 out of 10! I was convinced I’d get them all right. I got 3 and 5 wrong.
Pingback: Five Fascinating Facts about Herman Melville | Interesting Literature
Pingback: Five Fascinating Facts about George Orwell’s 1984 | Interesting Literature
I must admit I didn’t actually do the quiz without cheating – I’m far too ignorant – but I did enjoy reading the answers. And as for the Woozle effect, I must remember that one – there’s an awful lot of Woozling in this world …
What fun. Thanks also for following my blog.
The Woozle effect – I’m going to be telling people about that for weeks
I failed the quiz. :( Not surprising, really, but I enjoyed it nonetheless. I’m enjoying your site, it’s refreshing- glad you’re here! I’m quite curious where that image of the fool comes from. Perhaps you could tell me something about it? The image resonates with me on a couple of levels. Good reading and writing to you!
I loved this post! I won’t say how many I got right but there were definitely some I knew for certain. I so wish the Orwell one was true however…
Cheers, Ken! I devised this to be as fiendish as possible, so your knowledge must have come in handy. Good work!
You did a great job!
Pingback: The Woozle Effect | Norah's Knowledge Bank 2014
7/10, also many from intuition/lucky guesses.
If #10 were false, though, I’d certainly instigate an effort to make it true.
Well done – 7/10 is above average and a very good show! And agreed, I’m glad that the Woozle effect is a thing :)
Got most wrong. Awesome quiz
Thanks! Don’t worry, it’s mostly guesswork I think, so no shame in being caught out by these fiendish facts ;)
7 out of 10. But some were the result of following my intuition (i.e. lucky guesses!)
As I always say, the guesses count too!
I got 0! Better for me though, I learned more things than most people. Have to look it on the bright side.
Always interesting passing by your blog Mr. Interesting Literature.
Thanks very much, and thank you for reading, as ever, and for having a go at the quiz! Always much appreciated. And don’t worry about that score – it just means that you zigged when you should have zagged, since I think most people who’ve had a go have acknowledged there’s been a fair bit of guesswork involved. You just had an unlucky day!
Reblogged this on Picasso Plate and commented:
Love it!
3 wrong. I am inconsolable. (Not a good enough guesser, I guess.)
3 wrong means a very impressive (and, based on the scores I’ve heard other people have got, above-average) 7 right, so I’d say that your educated guesses were on the whole very good!
Pingback: Fool me once . . . | The D/A Dialogues
Got half of them. Having read the snopes on Lewis Carroll, while it may very well be true that Dodgson/Carroll did not send a math text to Queen Victoria, that the debunking is not itself convincing. Dodgson had also denied he was Carroll. He was a complicated person. It would be better if Queen Victoria had denied receiving it.
The Italian “13” story may well be true but does seem odd. In Italy time is measured on a 24 hour clock, so 13 is one pm. By 1948 there would have been clocks of sorts marking time in all 24 hours so it is hard to imagine a translator using this explanation.
A fun quiz.
Thanks for the comment, Steve, and I take your point about the Carroll story. I’ll have to do a bit more delving into the matter to see if there’s any further evidence one way or the other.
I know what you mean about the 24-hour clock thing. I was inclined to doubt it because it smacks too much of a cultural misunderstanding or ‘lost in translation’ story, much like the Grapes of Wrath/Angry Raisins myth. The research will continue!
Hmmm, 5 out of 10 for me! Fun quiz :)
Thanks, Marie! 5 out of 10 is perfectly respectable, especially as there are some sneaky ones in there :)
Thank you! I feel better about my score now :)
I got 6/10! Join the fun over at http://www.thatssojacob.wordpress.com :)
Pingback: True or False? Take Our April Fool’s Literary Quiz | Willow's Corner
This blog earned a Bean’s Pat as blog pick of the day. Check it out at: http://patbean.wordpress.com
Thank you, Pat!
I got half right. :) Fun quiz.
Good work! Half right is pretty good, given that the quiz was devised to trick you with every question ;) And thanks!
Reblogged this on The Mad Literature Professor and commented:
Here’s a fun literary trivia quiz from interestingliterature.com
Great post! I loved learning these tidbits (I only knew the Woolf and Melville anecdotes). I especially love finding out about the term Woozle! I remember watching that episode when I was little…I can just visualize Pooh and Piglet whispering and tiptoeing as they listen for Woozles. Thanks for doing the same with these literary Woozles!
Woozle is such a great word, isn’t it! Thanks, Sarrah – more people should know about the Woozle effect :)
Later, after I commented, I remembered: Pooh and Piglet weren’t just hunting for Woozles–it was Hephalumps (or Heffalumps?) and Woozles. I wonder if someone’s come up with a figurative meaning for Hephalumps yet. Hmm…maybe Hephalumps are culturally-absorbed false facts that originated in purposeful spreading of misinformation, as opposed to the accidental spreading of Woozles. “Hephalump” seems like an appropriate name for a big, fat, conspiratorial lie.
I like that. Perhaps we should submit it to the good people at Urban Dictionary? See if it’ll take off ;)
I got 6, but I guessed on many of them. Fun post!
Thanks! I think 6 is pretty good, given I’d designed the quiz to be as deceitful as possible! :)
I’m good at tests. :)
I got seven out of ten. Missed Bradbury and both Orwells. This was fun!
Thanks! And seven out of ten is pretty impressive, given the fiendishness of the quiz!
Fun:)
Glad you enjoyed it!
i got 6 out of 10… you can get easily fooled with these facts
Glad the quiz succeeded in being a true April Fools’ quiz! :)
I got them all wrong except for number 4 – which I correctly guessed. Virginia was such a twat. I mean prat.
Haha, I’m inclined to agree with you, Bruce – and the quiz must have been even more fiendish than I’d planned!
I got six of ’em. But I guessed a few times.
Good work, all the same!
Reblogged this on Anglais Pour Tous' blog.
I really wanted the Big Brother one to be true. LOL It makes such a good story. Lots of good stories in this. Great post!
I know! I was fooled by that one too, Brenda – shame it turns out to be a hoax! And thanks!
I got 50% right. I am easily fooled! Fun quiz.
Thanks! That means it was sufficiently fiendish ;)