Advertisements

A Short Analysis of Shakespeare’s Sonnet 30: ‘When to the sessions of sweet silent thought’

A reading of Shakespeare’s 30th sonnet

‘When to the sessions of sweet silent thought / I summon up remembrance of things past’: these rank among the more famous lines from Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Sonnet 30 very much continues the idea introduced in the previous sonnet, that when he’s feeling a bit down the poet can make himself feel much better simply by thinking of the Fair Youth. Here is a short summary and analysis of Sonnet 30 and its uplifting loveliness.

When to the sessions of sweet silent thought
I summon up remembrance of things past,
I sigh the lack of many a thing I sought,
And with old woes new wail my dear time’s waste:
Then can I drown an eye, unused to flow,
For precious friends hid in death’s dateless night,
And weep afresh love’s long since cancelled woe,
And moan the expense of many a vanished sight:
Then can I grieve at grievances foregone,
And heavily from woe to woe tell o’er
The sad account of fore-bemoaned moan,
Which I new pay as if not paid before.
But if the while I think on thee, dear friend,
All losses are restor’d and sorrows end.

The second line may be familiar to some readers as the title of one of the English translations of Marcel Proust’s À la recherche du temps perdu (although in fact, Shakespeare himself was quoting the phrase: it’s found in the Wisdom of Solomon, a book from the Old Testament Apocrypha: ‘For a double griefe came upon them, and a groaning for the remembrance of things past’). This, and that opening line’s reference to ‘the sessions of sweet silent thought’, set the trend for Sonnet 30: it’s a poem of quiet contemplation, less ranting or frenetic than the previous sonnet.

In summary, Shakespeare tells us – and the Fair Youth to whom he addresses Sonnet 30 – that when he starts to think back over his life, he begins to feel down when he reflects how he has failed to achieve the things he wanted, and has wasted so much time. He weeps for his friends who are now dead, for unrequited love that has long since been banished from his mind (until now, anyway); he also weeps for things which he can no longer look upon and enjoy. Then he is made unhappy again by insults and slights he has received in the past (that are dead and buried), and he can add up his list of woes as though they’re recorded in an accounts book. These woes are all ‘fore-bemoanèd’, i.e. he’s already chewed them over many times and been made sad by them. It’s as if he’s paying for these past wrongs now for the first time, when in fact he’s already done so many times over in the past. But if Shakespeare simply thinks for a short while about the young man, then all of his sorrows are banished, and he is made happy again.

One of the most notable things about Sonnet 30 is Shakespeare’s use of financial terms from accounting: ‘dateless’, ‘cancell’d’, ‘expense’, ‘tell o’er’, ‘account’, ‘pay’, ‘losses’, and ‘restored’ are all borrowed from the world of accounts, but to these we might add ‘dear’ and ‘precious’, which – under pressure from these other words – come to take on a monetary flavour. It’s as if Shakespeare were analysing his list of woes in a methodical way, like a bookkeeper; this is not some disordered remembrance of past ills, but the action of an orderly and organised man who, for all his rational mindset, cannot get over the bad things that have happened to him in the past.

Sonnet 30 also borrows from the legal profession, too: ‘sessions’ and ‘summon’ in the first two lines are both related to the courts. There’s an official or ‘by-the-book’ feel to this poem, which prevents it from being mere self-indulgence. It also has a strong central conceit, as with many of the other sonnets. Shakespeare’s self-analysis and self-scrutiny are reined in by the economic tinge to the words he uses to describe his dark memories.

Advertisements

About interestingliterature

A blog dedicated to rooting out the interesting stuff about classic books and authors.

Posted on March 20, 2017, in Literature and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 4 Comments.

  1. Great analysis, especially on the word choice. I know that during this period and the one prior economic speech was also used to discuss marital relationships, as they were seen and dealt with as business deals. Shakespeare using so much financial language throughout this sonnet is definitely an important aspect, and a really good thing to focus on. Thank you for the post!

    • Thanks for the comment, and I’m glad you enjoyed the analysis. I couldn’t agree more: marriages were as much a financial agreement as a romantic match (indeed, often more so) in the period, as you say, so Shakespeare’s use of language here is entirely apt :)

  2. Jeanie Buckingham

    This is his best one yet, isn’t it.

    Sent from my iPad

    >

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: